# Parpan, Eversley Centre, Eversley

- **Decision:** dismissed, 8 September 2026
- **Decided by:** Planning Inspector: E Pickernell
- **Authority:** Hart (South East)
- **Appeal reference:** 6005123
- **Application reference:** 25/01827/FUL
- **Procedure:** written-representations
- **Development:** Replacement two-storey dwelling following demolition of bungalow and garage
- **Homes:** 1
- **Site context:** inside-settlement
- **Green Belt:** no
- **Framework applied:** No Framework version cited
- **Determinative policies:** P3
- **Development plan policies:** Hart Local Plan (Replacement) 1996-2006 saved GEN1, Hart Local Plan (Strategy and Sites) 2032 NBE9
- **Main issues:** neighbour living conditions (outlook)
- **Tags:** tier-2, overbearing, framework-not-cited, costs-application

## Summary
A replacement two-storey house was dismissed because its long two-storey flank would be overbearing on the neighbour's garden. The effect on the neighbour's rear windows was acceptable. The letter cites no Framework.

## What made the difference
The depth and height of the new flank alongside most of the neighbouring garden (DL ¶6). A modern, efficient dwelling and the Council's acceptance of its design did not outweigh this (DL ¶11).

## Policy findings
- **P3: fail.** Framework not cited; mapped. Two-storey flank running along most of neighbour's garden "particularly oppressive and imposing" (DL 5-8)

## Key facts
- Replacement moved south and raised from one to two storeys close to boundary of The White House
- Outlook from neighbour's rear windows acceptable (peripheral); garden harm decisive

## Sources
- https://appeal-planning-decision.service.gov.uk/published-document/f37c1935-7cb4-473c-b584-989400c6db45
- https://appeal-planning-decision.service.gov.uk/comment-planning-appeal/appeals/6005123

---

Source: https://planningdistilled.org/research/england/nppf-navigator/decisions/PINS-6005123.html

A summary of a public planning decision, written from the decision letter. Not legal advice. © Planning Distilled. Released under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 licence (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/): share and adapt freely, with credit to Planning Distilled. Quotations from decision letters, plans and the Framework remain the copyright of their publishers.