# 83 Attingham Drive, Dudley

- **Decision:** allowed, 21 August 2026
- **Decided by:** Planning Inspector: Andrew Fuller
- **Authority:** Dudley (West Midlands)
- **Appeal reference:** 6007589
- **Application reference:** P25/1167
- **Procedure:** written-representations
- **Development:** Change of use of 4-bed house (C3) to children's care home (C2) for one child, with side parking and retrospective fencing
- **Site context:** inside-settlement
- **Green Belt:** no
- **Framework applied:** August 2026 NPPF
- **Determinative policies:** development-plan-only
- **Development plan policies:** Dudley Borough Development Strategy 2017 S6, L2, Black Country Core Strategy 2011 ENV3, Dudley Residential Design Guide SPD 2023, Dudley Regulation 19 Local Plan 2024 (great weight)
- **Main issues:** character and appearance, garden space for occupier
- **Tags:** tier-2, childrens-home, specialist-housing, no-framework-reference, limited-nppf-engagement

## Summary
Change of use of an estate house in Dudley to a single-child care home, with side parking and fencing. Allowed with a one-child occupancy condition. Parking and fencing fitted the estate's character, and the slightly reduced garden was adequate for one child and carers. The "S6" in the slice index is Dudley Development Strategy Policy S6, not Framework S6.

## What made the difference
A purely development-plan decision. Low occupancy (one child) meant the garden-size SPD standards for new houses did not bite (DL ¶¶14–15). Neighbours' fear of crime and cohesion concerns were not backed by evidence (DL ¶¶17–18). The letter, dated 21 Aug 2026, does not engage with the new Framework at all, which is a transition gap.

## Policy findings
- **Dudley Development Strategy S6 / BCCS ENV3: accord.** side parking and fencing typical of the estate; tree retained (DL 5-10)
- **Dudley Development Strategy L2: accord.** garden only marginally reduced; adequate for one child with EBD and up to three carers (DL 11-16)

## Key facts
- Condition limits use to a children's care home for one child (DL 1)
- Letter makes no substantive reference to the 2026 Framework (only in conditions paragraph); decided 4 days after publication with no transition note
- Emerging Reg 19 plan given "great weight" but did not alter the issues (DL 3)

## Sources
- https://appeal-planning-decision.service.gov.uk/comment-planning-appeal/appeals/6007589
- https://appeal-planning-decision.service.gov.uk/published-document/f1dbb8dd-41f0-496b-a069-05f276f694a3

---

Source: https://planningdistilled.org/research/england/nppf-navigator/decisions/PINS-6007589.html

A summary of a public planning decision, written from the decision letter. Not legal advice. © Planning Distilled. Released under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 licence (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/): share and adapt freely, with credit to Planning Distilled. Quotations from decision letters, plans and the Framework remain the copyright of their publishers.