# Premier House, 13 Bark Street East, Bolton

- **Decision:** dismissed, 22 September 2026
- **Decided by:** Planning Inspector: E Fawcett
- **Authority:** Bolton (North West)
- **Appeal reference:** 6009276
- **Application reference:** 21353/25
- **Procedure:** written-representations
- **Development:** Change of use of Class E building to 2 flats
- **Homes:** 2
- **Site context:** inside-settlement, conservation-area
- **Green Belt:** no
- **Framework applied:** August 2026 NPPF
- **Determinative policies:** S4, P3, HE6, DP3
- **Development plan policies:** Places for Everyone JDPD 2024 JP-H3, JP-P1, JP-P2, Bolton Core Strategy 2011 CG4, General Design Principles SPD
- **Main issues:** living conditions, conservation area
- **Tags:** s4-within-settlement, s4-substantially-outweighed, living-conditions, conservation-area, small-scheme, parties-consulted-on-2026-framework, tier-2

## Summary
Conversion of a town-centre commercial building in Bolton's St George's Conservation Area into two flats was dismissed. The flats would give poor living conditions (P3, significant weight), and the lack of detail on windows, heat pumps and PV meant CA harm could not be ruled out (HE6). Under S4 the benefits were "substantially outweighed" (DL ¶35).

## What made the difference
Poor internal amenity (below NDSS, oppressive 3.8 m outlook, workshop noise) and missing heritage detail. HO7 weight was cut to moderate because "there is no substantive evidence before me which identifies such a need for the type of accommodation proposed" (DL ¶31). That is a notable reading: HO7's substantial weight was tied to evidenced need for the specific type of home.

## Policy findings
- **P3: fail (significant weight).** 1-bed flat below NDSS; 3.8 m outlook to joiner's workshop; poor daylight to second-floor rooms; no usable outdoor space; workshop noise (DL 5-15, 34)
- **HE6: harm (considerable weight).** lower-end harm to St George's CA from unspecified windows, ASHPs and PV; public benefits (moderate for re-use/low-carbon) do not outweigh (DL 16-27)
- **HO7: benefit (moderate weight).** no evidence of need for this type of accommodation, so moderate not substantial (DL 31)
- **S4: fail.** benefits substantially outweighed (DL 35)

## Key facts
- Two flats in the north of Bolton town centre, in a CA; ground-floor bedroom window 3.8 m from a two-storey joiner's workshop against a 13.5 m SPD interface
- Amended plans not accepted (substantial change)

## Sources
- https://appeal-planning-decision.service.gov.uk/comment-planning-appeal/appeals/6009276
- https://appeal-planning-decision.service.gov.uk/published-document/adf285f4-9d6b-4c4f-9f05-b0f2f6bf333a

---

Source: https://planningdistilled.org/research/england/nppf-navigator/decisions/PINS-6009276.html

A summary of a public planning decision, written from the decision letter. Not legal advice. © Planning Distilled. Released under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 licence (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/): share and adapt freely, with credit to Planning Distilled. Quotations from decision letters, plans and the Framework remain the copyright of their publishers.