← Service Village, Not Sustainable

A1 · Relied on for the scheme, with route evidence

Land off Beech Lane, Kislingbury (58 dwellings)

westnorthants-WNS-2022-0673-MAF·West Northamptonshire·8 Sept 2026refused·WNS/2022/0673/MAF

Tier label used

Secondary Service Village A

What the decision says (from the case file)

“adjoins Kislingbury (Secondary Service Village A) with a school, shop, pubs and a regular bus to Northampton”

Why this is cited

Secondary Service Village with services and bus accepted for S5(1)(j); refused on a stack of harms. In the register this counts as a case where the tier was relied on for the scheme alongside real route evidence.

Sources

Application on the council planning portal · case file cases/westnorthants-WNS-2022-0673-MAF.md · quoted from cases/westnorthants-WNS-2022-0673-MAF.md

One entry in a register of 170 decisions that use a settlement-tier label, each read at every matching passage and classified by how the label influenced the decision. The quotation was checked against the source named above. Not legal advice.