Route decision · no settlement tier cited
A PIP for up to three dwellings on a gap along a rural 60 mph lane in the West Lancashire Green Belt. The site was accepted as grey belt and unmet need was established. However, the lack of any footway between the site and the pedestrian network at Southport Road meant it failed GB7(1)(g)(iii)/TR3, even though the distance was short and some street lighting existed. As inappropriate development with openness harm, it was dismissed on the VSC balance. The S5(5) balance was expressly held not to be engaged.
The missing footway link. The Inspector contrasted this site with the neighbouring Holly Farm scheme, which was acceptable because it secured a footway connection. A short distance and partial lighting could not make up for walking in the carriageway of a 60 mph lane with farm traffic. If a continuous footway to Southport Road had been deliverable, limb (iii) would probably have passed.
Decision on the Planning Inspectorate appeals service · case file cases/PINS-6007428.md