Route decision · no settlement tier cited
Conversion of a barn complex to five dwellings in the Tandridge Green Belt, where supply is 1.97 years. Grey belt and unmet need were accepted, but GB7(1)(g)(iii) failed: the site is on a 40 mph lane with no footways or lighting, away from settlements and buses. As inappropriate development causing openness, heritage (Grade II setting), character and amenity harm, it did not show VSC even with an acute shortfall. Dismissed.
Location. The site is isolated from settlements and buses, on an unlit 40 mph lane with no footway, which failed limb (iii) and made the scheme inappropriate. Heritage harm independently failed HE6. Even an acute 1.97-year supply only earned moderate weight for five homes. A site adjoining a settlement with a footway, or a scheme confined to the LDC fallback footprint, might have succeeded.
Decision on the Planning Inspectorate appeals service · case file cases/PINS-6010313.md