← Stratford decisions under the 2026 NPPF
Case summary
61 Brackley Square, Woodford Green
Appeal 6005325 · London Borough of Redbridge · Planning Inspector · decided 27 August 2026 · dismissed
Subdivision of garden and development of a two-storey detached 3-bedroom dwelling on the land to the rear.
Case page · Decision letter
Cited in: 1. DP3(3) as a "should be refused" policy
Why this is cited. This appeal shows the same DP3(3) trigger applied to conflicts with DP3's principles on tree cover and access: the conflict meant the proposal “should be refused” and the housing benefit was substantially outweighed.
Key points
- Tree loss: "contrary to the key principles in Policy DP3 of the Framework 2026, which include maintaining and enhancing tree cover" (¶23).
- "Policy DP3 paragraph 3 states that development proposals should be refused" (¶30).
Quotations are from the officer report, decision notice or appeal decision letter, with page (p.) or paragraph (¶) numbers. Read the decision itself for the full reasoning.
Summarised for the note on Stratford decisions under the August 2026 NPPF. Not legal advice. Back to the note.