Leydens Farm, Lydens Lane, Hever

appeal 6005088·Sevenoaks·16 September 2026dismissed
Decision
dismissed, 16 September 2026
Decided by
Planning Inspector: Claire Coles
Authority
Sevenoaks (South East)
Appeal reference
6005088
Application reference
25/02484/HOUSE
Procedure
householder
Development
Ancillary outbuilding in residential curtilage (three offices, kitchen, WCs, waiting area), with UU to forgo an approved pool building
Site context
green belt, national landscape, open countryside
Green Belt
Yes
Framework applied
August 2026 NPPF
Determinative policies
GB7(1)(b), GB6(2), N4
Development plan policies
Sevenoaks ADMP GB3, EN5, Sevenoaks Green Belt SPD
Main issues
inappropriate development; openness and purposes; National Landscape; VSC

Summary

An office-like "ancillary" outbuilding at a mixed-use farm complex in the Green Belt and High Weald National Landscape. The appellant offered a UU not to build a larger approved pool building. Dismissed. A new building is not covered by GB7(1)(b), and the swap failed because the appeal building would be sited further out and encroach more. There was also harm to the National Landscape.

Issues and findings

Planning balance

GB6(2). VSC not shown (DL ¶27).

What made the difference

Siting and use. A smaller building swapped for a larger approved one still loses if it spreads development further into open land and looks commercial.

Transferable points

Policy findings

Policy codes are those of the National Planning Policy Framework (August 2026) unless a development plan is named.

PolicyFindingWeightNote
GB7(1)(b)failnew building, not reuse/extension; as a "replacement" for the unbuilt approved pool building it is not the same use; layout suggests commercial use (DL 6-9)
DM6failancillary-use condition would not be relevant because the building is functionally commercial (DL 10)
GB6(2)harmsubstantialspatial/visual openness harm and encroachment; sited further from the building cluster than the approved pool building (DL 13-18)
GB2(c)harmencroachment into countryside (DL 17)
N4harmsubstantialcommercial appearance harms High Weald National Landscape (DL 19-24)
fallbackneutralPD outbuilding fallback unevidenced; UU swap with larger pool building did not offset because the new siting encroaches more (DL 16, 25)

Key facts

Sources

This note is one of the decisions behind the NPPF 2026 Navigator, which shows how each Framework test has been applied across all the decisions in the database. Also available as Markdown.