42 Prince Drive, Oadby

appeal 6006636·Oadby and Wigston·17 August 2026dismissed
Decision
dismissed, 17 August 2026
Decided by
Planning Inspector: Timothy Parton
Authority
Oadby and Wigston (East Midlands)
Appeal reference
6006636
Application reference
25/00301/COU
Procedure
written representations
Development
Change of use from dwelling (C3) to children's care home for 3 children (C2)
Site context
inside settlement
Green Belt
No
Framework applied
No Framework version cited
Determinative policies
HO9
Development plan policies
Oadby and Wigston Local Plan 2019 Policies 2, 6, 11, Residential Development SPD 2019
Main issues
need for C2 use; living conditions

Summary

A three-child care home was dismissed because Policy 11 was read as requiring a need specific to the Borough. County and national sufficiency evidence was not enough, set against a county email saying no local children were awaiting placement. The loss of a C3 home in an area of significant housing need counted against it. No Framework is cited (letter dated 17 Aug).

What made the difference

The up-to-date, Borough-specific county email (DL ¶12). Compare PINS-6006244 (Havering), where the Council's own Sufficiency Assessment established need, and the fork cases on HO7/HO9 for children's homes (PINS-6010861, PINS-6011401).

Policy findings

Policy codes are those of the National Planning Policy Framework (August 2026) unless a development plan is named.

PolicyFindingWeightNote
HO9failFramework not cited; Policy 11 read as requiring Borough-specific need; county/national evidence insufficient; LCC email: no Oadby and Wigston children awaiting placement (DL 3-13)
HO7harmloss of a C3 dwelling given significant Borough housing need (DL 14-16)
P3passNDSS-compliant rooms, adequate staff space (DL 17-22)

Key facts

Related decisions

Sources

This note is one of the decisions behind the NPPF 2026 Navigator, which shows how each Framework test has been applied across all the decisions in the database. Also available as Markdown.