Primrose Farm, Bradcutts Lane, Cookham Dean

appeal 6008689·Windsor and Maidenhead·7 September 2026allowed
Decision
allowed, 7 September 2026
Decided by
Planning Inspector: P Brennan
Authority
Windsor and Maidenhead (South East)
Appeal reference
6008689
Application reference
26/00116/OUT
Procedure
written representations
Development
Appeal against personal-occupancy, cessation and restoration conditions (4-6) on outline permission for a dwelling replacing part of a landscape contractor's workshop
Homes
1
Site context
green belt, PDL
Green Belt
Yes
Framework applied
No Framework version cited
Determinative policies
DM6
Development plan policies
RBWM Borough Local Plan 2013-2033 QP3, EP1
Main issues
necessity/reasonableness of occupancy; cessation and restoration conditions

Summary

A personal occupancy condition, and conditions requiring the dwelling to be demolished and the land restored when the appellant leaves, were replaced by a single condition tying occupation to employment in the on-site landscaping business. The replacement condition is enough to protect future occupiers from yard noise (DL ¶12-17).

What made the difference

The planning concern was the relationship between the house and the business, not the person occupying it. The Framework is not cited at all. The conditions tests were applied without any policy reference.

Policy findings

Policy codes are those of the National Planning Policy Framework (August 2026) unless a development plan is named.

PolicyFindingWeightNote
DM6passcode mapped by harvester — personal condition replaced by business-tied occupancy condition; demolition/restoration conditions "overzealous and unreasonable" and unnecessary (DL 12-17)
P3neutralcode mapped by harvester — yard noise 13-18dB above background; low effect if occupier linked to business (DL 10-12)

Key facts

Sources

This note is one of the decisions behind the NPPF 2026 Navigator, which shows how each Framework test has been applied across all the decisions in the database. Also available as Markdown.