White House Farm, Main Street, Ealand

appeal 6009098·North Lincolnshire·15 September 2026dismissed
Decision
dismissed, 15 September 2026
Decided by
Planning Inspector: Richard Gilbert
Authority
North Lincolnshire (Yorkshire and the Humber)
Appeal reference
6009098
Application reference
PA/2025/1145
Procedure
written representations
Development
Permission in principle for conversion of a redundant stone storage barn to 1 dwelling
Homes
1
Site context
inside settlement, flood zone 3
Green Belt
No
Framework applied
August 2026 NPPF
Determinative policies
F4, F7, S4
Development plan policies
North Lincolnshire Local Plan 2003 DS14, DS16
Main issues
suitability of site - location; land use; amount (flood risk)

Summary

Permission in principle for converting a barn in Flood Zone 3, within the development limit of Ealand, to one dwelling. Dismissed because no flood risk assessment was submitted. The inspector held that F4's requirement for a site-specific FRA applies to PiP applications, because an FRA's "scale, nature and location" correspond to PiP's location, land use and amount. Without one, a change from less to more vulnerable use in Flood Zone 3 had to be treated as a substantial adverse effect. That substantially outweighed the limited benefit of one home under S4.

Issues and findings

Planning balance

S4. One dwelling and reuse of a building: limited weight (DL ¶28). "A precautionary approach is therefore necessary which, in the absence of sufficient flood risk information required by Policy F4, leads me to conclude that a residential use in Flood Zone 3 would have a substantial adverse effect on future occupiers" (DL ¶29).

What made the difference

The missing FRA, plus the more vulnerable use in Flood Zone 3. The sequential and exception tests did not apply because this was a change of use. A proportionate FRA covering location, use and amount would have removed the only reason for refusal.

Transferable points

Policy findings

Policy codes are those of the National Planning Policy Framework (August 2026) unless a development plan is named.

PolicyFindingWeightNote
F4failsite-specific FRA required for "all development proposals" in FZ2/3, including PiP — scale, nature and location map onto location, land use and amount (DL 9, 12-14)
F5not-engagedchange of use so sequential and exception tests not required (DL 12)
F7failprecautionary approach; less vulnerable to more vulnerable use; substantial adverse effect on future occupiers (DL 10, 21, 29)
L2(1)(b)benefitlimitedreuse of vacant building, but conversion capability unproven until TDC (DL 18)
S4faillimited benefits of one dwelling substantially outweighed (DL 27-30)

Key facts

Sources

This note is one of the decisions behind the NPPF 2026 Navigator, which shows how each Framework test has been applied across all the decisions in the database. Also available as Markdown.