46 The Beck, Elford, Tamworth (new dwelling in side garden)

appeal 6009207·Lichfield·17 August 2026dismissed
Decision
dismissed, 17 August 2026
Decided by
Planning Inspector: John Morrison (on recommendation of appeal planning officer Kim Vo)
Authority
Lichfield (West Midlands)
Appeal reference
6009207
Application reference
26/00078/FUL
Procedure
written representations
Development
New two-storey 3-bed detached dwelling in the side garden of a semi-detached house
Homes
1
Site context
inside settlement
Green Belt
No
Framework applied
August 2026 NPPF
Determinative policies
s38(6), DP3, TR6
Development plan policies
Lichfield Local Plan Strategy 2015 CP3, CP5, BE1, ST1, ST2, Elford NP 2019 DH1
Main issues
character and appearance; highway safety

Summary

A detached house squeezed into the side garden of a semi-detached house in Elford was dismissed. It would appear cramped, fill a characterful gap, and share a sub-standard access with no on-site turning (DL ¶8, ¶11-14). The case was decided plan-led, with no S4 balance, on the first day of the new Framework (DL ¶4).

What made the difference

The side gap's townscape role, and the inability to turn vehicles on site (DL ¶7, ¶13-14).

Policy findings

Policy codes are those of the National Planning Policy Framework (August 2026) unless a development plan is named.

PolicyFindingWeightNote
DP3harmcramped detached dwelling fills a side gap that acts as a transition between two house types (DL 6-9)
TR6failshared access under 4.2 m and no on-site turning, so reversing onto the road (DL 10-17)
HO7benefitlimitedone self-occupied home; limited benefits (DL 18-19)

Key facts

Sources

This note is one of the decisions behind the NPPF 2026 Navigator, which shows how each Framework test has been applied across all the decisions in the database. Also available as Markdown.