12 Victoria Road, Whetstone (dwelling in rear garden)

appeal 6009910·Blaby·1 October 2026dismissed
Decision
dismissed, 1 October 2026
Decided by
Planning Inspector: M Harrison
Authority
Blaby (East Midlands)
Appeal reference
6009910
Application reference
25/0987/FUL
Procedure
written representations
Development
Erection of a two-bedroom dwelling and detached double garage to the rear of 12 Victoria Road
Homes
1
Site context
inside settlement, garden land
Green Belt
No
Framework applied
August 2026 NPPF
Determinative policies
S4(1)
Development plan policies
Blaby District Local Plan Core Strategy 2013 CS2, Blaby District Local Plan Delivery DPD 2019 DM1 (local)
Main issues
character and appearance; living conditions

Summary

A two-storey house and double garage in the rear garden of a semi-detached house on a corner plot in Whetstone was dismissed. It would break the pattern of houses fronting the street with long rear gardens, and the fixed obscure glazing needed to protect neighbours would leave future occupiers with a poor outlook and very small gardens. Under S4 the limited benefit of one home, without a five-year supply, was substantially outweighed.

Issues and findings

Planning balance

S4(1) in two paragraphs. The harms are found against local plan policies only; no Framework design or amenity policy is named, and the DP3(3) question is not asked (DL ¶8, ¶12–14).

What made the difference

The site was too tight: protecting the neighbours required glazing that made the house itself unsatisfactory. A single-storey building, in keeping with the outbuildings found in neighbouring gardens, would not have raised the same issues.

Transferable points

Policy findings

Policy codes are those of the National Planning Policy Framework (August 2026) unless a development plan is named.

PolicyFindingWeightNote
S4(1)failone dwelling without a five-year supply is a limited benefit, substantially outweighed by significant character and living-conditions harm (DL 13-14)
DP3conflictmapped: Framework design policy not cited; two-storey house and double garage in a rear garden conflict with the pattern of semi-detached houses with long gardens; significant harm under local CS2 and DM1 (DL 5-8)
L2(1)(d)(ii)conflictmapped: Framework not cited; all first-floor windows except the front would be obscure-glazed and fixed, and gardens very small; poor living conditions for future occupiers under local DM1 (DL 9-12)
HO7benefitlimitedone dwelling; Council cannot show a five-year supply (figure not stated); benefit "would be limited in this context"; HO7 not named (DL 14)

Key facts

Sources

This note is one of the decisions behind the NPPF 2026 Navigator, which shows how each Framework test has been applied across all the decisions in the database. Also available as Markdown.