Pavement outside Aldi, 76-86 High Street, Feltham

appeal 6010150·Hounslow·11 September 2026allowed
Decision
allowed, 11 September 2026
Decided by
Planning Inspector: K Lancaster
Authority
Hounslow (London)
Appeal reference
6010150
Application reference
P/2026/0885
Procedure
written representations
Development
BT Street Hub (Appeal A) and two 75-inch digital advert screens (Appeal B, ref 6010152, P/2026/0780)
Site context
inside settlement
Green Belt
No
Framework applied
August 2026 NPPF
Determinative policies
TR4
Development plan policies
Hounslow Local Plan 2015-2030 EC2, CC5
Main issues
pedestrian movement and safety; public safety (advert)

Summary

BT Street Hub with digital adverts on a wide Feltham town-centre pavement. Both appeals allowed. The retained 2.9m footway exceeds the 2m minimum in DfT Inclusive Mobility, and the council had no adopted width standard (DL ¶11-12). Parties were invited to comment on the 2026 Framework (DL ¶3), but no Framework policy is cited on the merits.

What made the difference

Pavement width, measured against a national guidance benchmark. Contrast PINS-6010180 (Huddersfield), where a hub in a tighter, uncluttered conservation-area street was dismissed. Drafting slip: the Appeal B banner names "Manchester City Council" as the decision-maker, not Hounslow.

Policy findings

Policy codes are those of the National Planning Policy Framework (August 2026) unless a development plan is named.

PolicyFindingWeightNote
TR4pass5.4m pavement reduced to about 2.9m clear, above the 2m Inclusive Mobility minimum; crossing not impeded (DL 10-13); code mapped by harvester (letter cites local policies only)
HE9neutraladjacent to Feltham Town Centre CA; conservation officer no objection; setting preserved (DL 15); code mapped by harvester

Key facts

Related decisions

Sources

This note is one of the decisions behind the NPPF 2026 Navigator, which shows how each Framework test has been applied across all the decisions in the database. Also available as Markdown.