5 Silverwood Road, Peterborough (annexe to flat)

appeal 6010349·Peterborough·24 September 2026dismissed
Decision
dismissed, 24 September 2026
Decided by
Planning Inspector: Andrew Fuller
Authority
Peterborough (East of England)
Appeal reference
6010349
Application reference
25/01209/FUL
Procedure
written representations
Development
Retrospective change of use of a granny annexe to a separate one-bedroom flat
Homes
1
Site context
inside settlement
Green Belt
No
Framework applied
August 2026 NPPF
Determinative policies
S4, P3, TR4, L2(1)(d)(ii)
Development plan policies
Peterborough Local Plan 2016-2036 LP13, LP17, Appendix C
Main issues
parking and highway safety; occupiers' living conditions; neighbours' privacy

Summary

Retrospective use of a rear granny annexe in Peterborough as a separate one-bedroom flat. Its main rooms face a tall boundary wall, its bedroom is overlooked from the main house, and the two homes share a tandem driveway on a congested street. Under S4 these harms (P3, TR4, L2(1)(d)(ii)) substantially outweighed one additional home. Dismissed.

Issues and findings

Planning balance

S4: HO7 substantial weight (the letter writes "Policy H07 of the Framework states that substantial weight should be given", DL ¶32). But the flat would "conflict with other policies of the Framework, including P3 in respect of living conditions and TR4 in respect of access and parking" (DL ¶33), and "I find the benefits of the proposal would be substantially outweighed by its adverse effects" (DL ¶33).

What made the difference

The annexe's rooms were designed as ancillary to the house. As a separate home, the wall-facing main rooms and overlooked bedroom gave unacceptable living conditions.

Transferable points

Policy findings

Policy codes are those of the National Planning Policy Framework (August 2026) unless a development plan is named.

PolicyFindingWeightNote
TR4failshared tandem driveway without independent access; congested street, parking on pavements; risk of conflict despite low accident record (DL 7-11, 33)
P3failliving and dining rooms face a tall boundary wall at close range - poor daylight and outlook; bedroom overlooked from No 5 (DL 12-16, 33)
L2(1)(d)(ii)failfails safe access and acceptable living standards (daylight, sunlight, privacy) (DL 24)
HO7benefitsubstantialletter says H07; one dwelling where no five-year supply (DL 32)
S4failbenefits substantially outweighed (DL 31-33)

Key facts

Sources

This note is one of the decisions behind the NPPF 2026 Navigator, which shows how each Framework test has been applied across all the decisions in the database. Also available as Markdown.