Pavement outside 10 Bargate Street, Southampton

appeal 6010617·Southampton·27 August 2026dismissed
Decision
dismissed, 27 August 2026
Decided by
Planning Inspector: S Leonard
Authority
Southampton (South East)
Appeal reference
6010617
Application reference
26/00357/FUL
Procedure
written representations
Development
Multifunctional communication hub with defibrillator and digital advertisement (Appeal A 6010617 planning; Appeal B 6010618 advertisement)
Site context
inside settlement, listed building setting, conservation area
Green Belt
No
Framework applied
August 2026 NPPF
Determinative policies
DP3, TR4(1)(c)(iii)
Development plan policies
Southampton Core Strategy Partial Review 2015 CS13, CS14, City Centre Action Plan 2015 AP16, AP19, Local Plan Review saved HE1, HE3, Streets and Spaces Framework SPD 2015
Main issues
character and appearance; heritage; advertisement amenity

Summary

Communication hub with a digital advert on Bargate Street, near the Grade I listed and scheduled Bar Gate. Both appeals were dismissed on street clutter and visual amenity, although no heritage harm was found. The letter includes an express comparison of the 2024 and 2026 heritage wording.

Issues and findings

Planning balance

Plan-led (s38(6)). Visual harm outweighed the moderated benefits. For the advertisement, benefits cannot count because control is limited to amenity and public safety (DL ¶34).

What made the difference

Placement between a regular row of street trees and right next to an existing ad unit. A near-identical scheme a few metres away had been dismissed in 2023, and nothing had changed (DL ¶¶28–30).

Transferable points

Policy findings

Policy codes are those of the National Planning Policy Framework (August 2026) unless a development plan is named.

PolicyFindingWeightNote
DP3fail2.63m bulky unit between regularly spaced street trees next to existing ad unit — cluttered, awkward, intrusive, also at night (DL 15-18, 24-25)
HE6(1)neutralInspector notes 2024 "great" weight now "substantial"; but then states "I have given great weight" (DL 9, 23)
HE6passno harm to setting of Grade I listed and scheduled Bar Gate; negligible effect on Old Town CA (site just outside CA, so s72 not engaged) (DL 5, 19-23)
CO1benefitmoderateneed not questioned; localised benefits, moderated because no evidence this is the only location; removal of other kiosks minimal weight (DL 31-33)

Key facts

Sources

This note is one of the decisions behind the NPPF 2026 Navigator, which shows how each Framework test has been applied across all the decisions in the database. Also available as Markdown.