12 Belfairs Drive, Chadwell Heath

appeal 6010851·Redbridge·17 August 2026allowed
Decision
allowed, 17 August 2026
Decided by
Planning Inspector: Peter Eggleton
Authority
Redbridge (London)
Appeal reference
6010851
Application reference
3433/25
Procedure
written representations
Development
Change of use of dwelling to C4 small HMO for up to six people, bin and cycle stores
Site context
inside settlement
Green Belt
No
Framework applied
December 2024 NPPF (transitional)
Determinative policies
S3
Development plan policies
Redbridge Local Plan 2018 LP5, LP26, London Plan 2021 H9, Housing Design SPD 2019
Main issues
housing mix and family homes

Summary

A small HMO in a Redbridge family house. Allowed. The letter is dated 17 August 2026, the day the new Framework took effect, but it applies the December 2024 paragraph 11(d)(ii) tilted balance word for word ("key policies for directing development to sustainable locations, making effective use of land, securing well-designed places and providing affordable homes") (DL ¶14). It does not mention the new Framework.

Issues and findings

Planning balance

The 2024 ¶11(d)(ii) tilted balance. The 2026 equivalent is S4(1) (within settlements: approve unless benefits "substantially outweighed"), which would favour the scheme at least as strongly.

What made the difference

The absence of a five-year supply and low HMO concentration. Same borough and outcome as PINS-6009905, which was decided under the 2026 Framework using HO7.

Transferable points

Policy findings

Policy codes are those of the National Planning Policy Framework (August 2026) unless a development plan is named.

PolicyFindingWeightNote
S3pass2024 ¶11(d)(ii) tilted balance quoted verbatim ("key policies for directing development to sustainable locations, making effective use of land, securing well-designed places and providing affordable homes"); loss of family house does not significantly and demonstrably outweigh benefits; council cannot show 5YHLS (figure not stated) (DL 14-16)
LP5 (Redbridge LP)accordmix policy aimed at housing sites not changes of use; weighs in favour of retaining larger homes (DL 5)
HO5benefitHMO lower-cost accommodation; 2 HMOs in street, well below the SPD 20% and 1-in-5 thresholds (DL 7-8, 15); code mapped by harvester

Key facts

Related decisions

Sources

This note is one of the decisions behind the NPPF 2026 Navigator, which shows how each Framework test has been applied across all the decisions in the database. Also available as Markdown.