34 Coalport Road, Broseley

appeal 6010905·Shropshire·17 September 2026dismissed
Decision
dismissed, 17 September 2026
Decided by
Planning Inspector: P Barton
Authority
Shropshire (West Midlands)
Appeal reference
6010905
Application reference
25/03794/FUL
Procedure
householder
Development
Erection of a high garden fence at the back of the pavement on a corner plot
Site context
inside settlement
Green Belt
No
Framework applied
August 2026 NPPF
Determinative policies
DP3, S4(2)(c)
Development plan policies
Shropshire Core Strategy 2011 CS6, SAMDev Plan 2015 MD2
Main issues
character and appearance

Summary

The proposal was a high garden fence at the back of the pavement that would enclose a grass strip at the entrance to an open-plan estate. The appeal was dismissed on character grounds. The inspector found the local plan design policies consistent with DP3, so the scheme "would fail to comply with one of the national decision-making policies which state that development proposals should be refused in specific circumstances, as set out in policy S4(2)(c)" (DL ¶13).

What made the difference

The site's gateway position and the loss of an open verdant strip decided it. A shorter approved wall inside the estate was distinguished (DL ¶7). A 1 m permitted-development fence was a weaker fallback (DL ¶8). The case shows the S4(2)(c)-via-DP3 route being used even for householder fences.

Policy findings

Policy codes are those of the National Planning Policy Framework (August 2026) unless a development plan is named.

PolicyFindingWeightNote
DP3failfence enclosing a grass strip at the open-plan estate's gateway is visually intrusive; LP CS6/MD2 consistent with DP3 (DL 6, 13)
S4(2)(c)failDP3 conflict treated as failing a "should be refused" policy; presumption does not apply (DL 13)

Key facts

Sources

This note is one of the decisions behind the NPPF 2026 Navigator, which shows how each Framework test has been applied across all the decisions in the database. Also available as Markdown.