Pittern Hill Riding School, Pittern Hill, Kineton

application 26/01764/PIP·Stratford-on-Avon·25 August 2026approved
Decision
approved, 25 August 2026
Decided by
Council officer (delegated): Case officer Sarah Flaherty (report 12 Aug; manager 15 Aug 2026)
Authority
Stratford-on-Avon (West Midlands)
Application reference
26/01764/PIP
Procedure
delegated
Development
Permission in principle for up to 6 dwellings on a former riding school (PDL) outside the Kineton BUAB
Homes
6
Site context
settlement edge, open countryside, PDL
Green Belt
No
Housing land supply
2.21 years
Framework applied
December 2024 NPPF (transitional)
Determinative policies
Transitional(1), S5(1)(d)
Development plan policies
Stratford-on-Avon Core Strategy 2016 CS.5, CS.9, CS.15, AS.10, Kineton NDP 2016 H1, H2
Main issues
principle outside settlement; landscape; PDL

Summary

PIP for up to 6 homes on a former riding school at the edge of Kineton, granted under delegated powers on 25 August 2026. The report was written before 17 August and runs the December 2024 11(d) tilted balance. A single "Procedural Issue" paragraph states that the outcome is the same under the 2026 Framework. It is a transitional example of how SDC closed out reports written under the old Framework.

Issues and findings

Planning balance

Old 11(d)(ii): significant weight to housing against no more than moderate harms. Re-labelled, but not re-run, under the 2026 Framework.

What made the difference

PDL next to a Main Rural Centre with a severe supply shortfall. Under the 2026 Framework it would probably pass S5(1)(d) or S5(1)(j) anyway, which is why the officer felt able to rely on a one-paragraph cross-check.

Transferable points

Policy findings

Policy codes are those of the National Planning Policy Framework (August 2026) unless a development plan is named.

PolicyFindingWeightNote
Transitional(1)neutralreport written under NPPF 2024 11(d); a "Procedural Issue" paragraph added after 17 Aug says the balance "remains generally consistent" under the 2026 NPPF, with no S5 analysis
S5(1)(d)not-engagedsite accepted as PDL under the NPPF definition, but S5(1)(d) not expressly applied
DP3harmmoderatelandscape sensitivity high/medium (2012 LSA); rising land at the settlement edge; moderate harm
HO7benefitsignificantup to 6 dwellings against 2.21 years; decided as NPPF 2024 benefits

Key facts

Sources

This note is one of the decisions behind the NPPF 2026 Navigator, which shows how each Framework test has been applied across all the decisions in the database. Also available as Markdown.