D · Tier counted against the site
category 1 settlement
“identified as a category 1 settlement and acknowledged by the Council to be a large built up area”
132 homes (50% affordable) on a contained field at the edge of Hurst Green/Oxted, decided after a two-day hearing. The inspector found the site was grey belt and passed all four GB7(1)(g) limbs, including sustainable location and the Golden Rules, so the scheme was not inappropriate. The station route GB7(1)(h) failed on walking distance. The appeal was still dismissed, on odour from the adjoining wastewater works, which arose late through a Southern Water objection. Odour harm "substantially outweighed" the benefits under S5(1)(j). A separate costs decision (costs PDF, 21 Sep 2026) awarded Wates full costs against Tandridge for unreasonable grey belt, sustainability and heritage reasons.
Category 1 status used to characterise Oxted as a large built-up area for grey-belt purpose (a): counted against the site. In the register this counts as a case where the tier counted against the site.
Decision on the Planning Inspectorate appeals service · full decision note · letter pins-corpus/6004144.txt