X · Search match excluded: services mentioned, tier not referenced
—
“accessible location in relation to the local services”
41 homes (39% affordable) on an arable field at the edge of Robertsbridge in the High Weald National Landscape, in a district with a 3.04-year supply and a 35% HDT score. Dismissed. The scheme met S5(1)(j) and was accessibly located, but the urbanising effect on the field and the loss of a historic sunken-lane bank for the access junction harmed the National Landscape. Given "greater than substantial weight", that harm substantially outweighed substantial housing benefits. DP3(3) was also invoked as a refusal policy.
This decision was picked up by the search on the words above, which refer to services, not to a settlement tier. generic; dismissed on National Landscape.
Decision on the Planning Inspectorate appeals service · full decision note · letter pins-corpus/6005903.txt