X · Search match excluded: services mentioned, tier not referenced
—
“their support of local services and facilities”
35 homes (40% affordable) on a field on the western edge of Smarden, beside the Grade II* Cloth Hall and the conservation area. Dismissed after hearing. Despite passing S5(1)(j) (3.16-year supply, agreed well-related), cumulative harm to five designated assets (unjustified under HE4/HE6), serious landscape harm and a suburban design with poor privacy "substantially outweigh" substantial housing and affordable benefits.
This decision was picked up by the search on the words above, which refer to services, not to a settlement tier. generic.
Decision on the Planning Inspectorate appeals service · full decision note · letter pins-corpus/6006475.txt