C · Tier cited in support, beside route or transport evidence
Category 1 / Category 2 settlements
“several Category 2 settlements as defined in the TDCS including Woldingham (56)”
“certain facilities are within a comfortable walk or cycle and although just over the 800m range at 850m, I am satisfied that future occupants would have a genuine choice of whether to walk or cycle to them”
Outline scheme for up to 30 homes (half affordable) on a field on the Caterham edge, within Chaldon in the Tandridge Green Belt. Allowed after an inquiry against a non-determination. Grey belt, "fundamentally undermine" (DL ¶27) and unmet need were settled, and the Golden Rules were met. The contested limb was GB7(1)(g)(iii). The inspector found a genuine choice of modes for local trips (schools, cafe, village hall and shop within walking and cycling distance, school buses and a two-hourly bus), even though the hill to Caterham deters walking and commuting by bus would be hard. The Connectivity Tool score of 52 was read comparatively, as the top band in Tandridge. The scheme was therefore not inappropriate, and S5(5) led to approval.
Connectivity scores of Category 2 settlements used as comparators to find the site sustainable; route and transport also assessed; allowed. In the register this counts as a case where the tier was cited in support of the scheme beside route or transport evidence.
Decision on the Planning Inspectorate appeals service · full decision note · letter pins-corpus/6006497.txt