← Service Village Does Not Mean Sustainable

C · Tier cited in support, beside route or transport evidence

Land at Mount Avenue, Chaldon (Caterham edge)

6006497·Tandridge·25 Sept 2026allowed·TA/2025/771

Tier label used

Category 1 / Category 2 settlements

The tier sentence ¶44

“several Category 2 settlements as defined in the TDCS including Woldingham (56)”

The route sentence ¶35

“certain facilities are within a comfortable walk or cycle and although just over the 800m range at 850m, I am satisfied that future occupants would have a genuine choice of whether to walk or cycle to them”

Summary

Outline scheme for up to 30 homes (half affordable) on a field on the Caterham edge, within Chaldon in the Tandridge Green Belt. Allowed after an inquiry against a non-determination. Grey belt, "fundamentally undermine" (DL ¶27) and unmet need were settled, and the Golden Rules were met. The contested limb was GB7(1)(g)(iii). The inspector found a genuine choice of modes for local trips (schools, cafe, village hall and shop within walking and cycling distance, school buses and a two-hourly bus), even though the hill to Caterham deters walking and commuting by bus would be hard. The Connectivity Tool score of 52 was read comparatively, as the top band in Tandridge. The scheme was therefore not inappropriate, and S5(5) led to approval.

The location finding

  • GB7(1)(g)(iii): pass. pre-school, primary school, village hall and cafe within about 850 m; shop 1.1 km; term-time school buses 150 m away; two-hourly 411 bus; gradient to Caterham a significant deterrent and commuting by bus challenging, but a genuine choice for local trips (DL 31-47)
  • TR3: pass. Connectivity Tool score 52, highest band within Tandridge and comparable to Category 2 settlements; s106 secures 20 mph TRO, traffic calming, bus stop upgrades and crossings (DL 32, 41-46, 66)

Why this is cited

Connectivity scores of Category 2 settlements used as comparators to find the site sustainable; route and transport also assessed; allowed. In the register this counts as a case where the tier was cited in support of the scheme beside route or transport evidence.

One entry in a register of 203 decisions that matched the search for a settlement-tier label, each read at every matching passage and classified by how the label influenced the decision. The quotation was checked against the source named above. Not legal advice. © Planning Distilled. Text, data and images on this page are released under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 licence: share and adapt them freely, with credit to Planning Distilled. Quotations from decision letters, plans and the Framework remain the copyright of their publishers. Source and data: github.com/planningdistilled/research.