X · Search match excluded: services mentioned, tier not referenced
—
“reasonably related to local services and facilities”
Nine permanent Gypsy and Traveller pitches on a 0.3 ha field in Flood Zone 3a near Hewish. Dismissed. The appeal was consistent with S5(1)(g): there is a large unmet need, no five-year pitch supply, and the emerging allocations are themselves in Flood Zone 3a. But permanent caravans are "Highly Vulnerable", which the new Annex F makes incompatible with Flood Zone 3a. F6 therefore says the proposal "should be refused". Under S5(2), that made the benefits "substantially outweighed" whether or not the sequential and exception tests were passed.
This decision was picked up by the search on the words above, which refer to services, not to a settlement tier. generic.
Decision on the Planning Inspectorate appeals service · full decision note · letter pins-corpus/6006629.txt