X · Search match excluded: services mentioned, tier not referenced
—
“ongoing spending and support for local services”
Permission in principle for two dwellings at a marquee hire yard in a scatter of buildings at Higher Trevellas was dismissed. The inspector found that Trevellas is not a settlement, that the yard is not previously developed land because its hardstanding and use are unauthorised, and that the site would extend a group of buildings and not infill it. With no S5(1) category met, S5(4) applied. Car reliance was given substantial weight and two homes were a modest benefit, so the benefits did not substantially outweigh the harm.
This decision was picked up by the search on the words above, which refer to services, not to a settlement tier. generic.
Decision on the Planning Inspectorate appeals service · full decision note · letter pins-corpus/6008432.txt