X · Search match excluded: services mentioned, tier not referenced
—
“local services and facilities including a”
A C3-to-C4 supported-housing HMO in a Coventry terrace was dismissed. The appellant had not shown the HMO would avoid a harmful concentration, or that parking and visitor demand could be absorbed on a full street. Under S4, the P3 and TR6(4) conflicts were described as "very substantial harm". That outweighed a supported-housing benefit whose need was not evidenced (DL ¶20-22).
This decision was picked up by the search on the words above, which refer to services, not to a settlement tier. generic.
Decision on the Planning Inspectorate appeals service · full decision note · letter pins-corpus/6008646.txt