X · Search match excluded: services mentioned, tier not referenced
—
“access to public transport and local services”
This was an 8-person HMO in a detached Feltham house with PTAL 1b, about 1.4 km from the nearest designated town centre. The appeal was dismissed on location alone. The inspector used DP3(2)(a), a design principle about good connections and prioritising walking and public transport. Through DP3(3), which says refuse, poor accessibility became a substantial-weight harm alongside TR3. Together they substantially outweighed the limited housing-choice benefit under S4.
This decision was picked up by the search on the words above, which refer to services, not to a settlement tier. generic.
Decision on the Planning Inspectorate appeals service · full decision note · letter pins-corpus/6008707.txt