D · Tier counted against the site
sustainable settlements
“seek to direct development towards sustainable settlements and strictly control development within the countryside”
Fifty self-storage containers on open land next to an equestrian business outside Claypole. The inspector accepted this was rural diversification (moderate weight), but convenience to the landowner did not show that a countryside location was necessary under S5(1)(b). The containers would also cause moderate harm to rural character. Dismissed on the development plan, with no S5(4) balance.
Site outside the settlement boundary of Claypole: against (self-storage containers); dismissed. In the register this counts as a case where the tier counted against the site.
Decision on the Planning Inspectorate appeals service · full decision note · letter pins-corpus/6008915.txt