X · Search match excluded: services mentioned, tier not referenced
—
“and larger settlements beyond”
Three homes on a wooded plot beside the A49 at Spurstow, a scattered roadside hamlet. Dismissed. The location was car-dependent: there is no continuous footway or lighting and no bus within walking distance, and a previous appeal found the same. The loss of woodland harmed rural character, and it was not shown that the retained trees could survive. The inspector accepted S5(1)(j) because the site is physically close to existing development. But the DP3 conflict without clear justification brought S5(2) into play, and the benefits (substantial weight to housing) were substantially outweighed.
This decision was picked up by the search on the words above, which refer to services, not to a settlement tier. plain; route (no footway, A49) decided.
Decision on the Planning Inspectorate appeals service · full decision note · letter pins-corpus/6009407.txt