← Service Village Does Not Mean Sustainable

D · Tier counted against the site

Land adjacent to Arcady, Coryates

6010834·Dorset·18 Sept 2026dismissed·P/FUL/2026/01044

Tier label used

larger settlements / DDBs

The tier sentence ¶9

“the majority of new housing is expected to be accommodated within the larger settlements”

Summary

A self-build bungalow in a garden between two dwellings in the hamlet of Coryates (Dorset National Landscape), outside any development boundary, in a district with a 2.53-year supply. Dismissed. The hamlet has no services and is 2.5 km from Portesham along unlit lanes without footways, so S5(1)(j) failed on "well-related to an existing settlement". The very limited benefits of one house were substantially outweighed. A second reason: no s106 securing self-build status, so the BNG exemption and biodiversity measures could not be relied on.

The location finding

  • TR3: harm. not cited by code; 2.5 km to Portesham on narrow unlit national-speed-limit lanes with no footways; heavily car-reliant (DL 11)

Why this is cited

Site not in a Defined Development Boundary: against. In the register this counts as a case where the tier counted against the site.

One entry in a register of 203 decisions that matched the search for a settlement-tier label, each read at every matching passage and classified by how the label influenced the decision. The quotation was checked against the source named above. Not legal advice. © Planning Distilled. Text, data and images on this page are released under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 licence: share and adapt them freely, with credit to Planning Distilled. Quotations from decision letters, plans and the Framework remain the copyright of their publishers. Source and data: github.com/planningdistilled/research.