C · Tier cited in support, beside route or transport evidence
Rural Area Larger Villages
“Biddulph Moor is identified as a larger village, under SMLP Policy SS8”
“Routes to these from the appeal site would be along Rudyard Road and Hot Lane, which have footpaths and street lighting, except for a stretch along Hot Lane, which I saw had no footpath.”
Permission in principle for up to nine dwellings on a field at the edge of the Green Belt village of Biddulph Moor. The appeal was allowed. The dispute was purpose (a): the inspector held that a "larger village" separate from Biddulph town is not a "large built-up area", so the site is grey belt. All the GB7(1)(g) limbs were met, including sustainable location, despite a short stretch of lane with no footway. The remaining conflict with the local plan's spatial strategy did not substantially outweigh the benefits under S5. A separate costs decision (local copy PINS-6011103-costs.pdf) refused costs.
Larger-village tier ("most sustainable settlements in the rural areas") plus a walked route (footpaths, lighting, one short gap) and buses; allowed. In the register this counts as a case where the tier was cited in support of the scheme beside route or transport evidence.
Decision on the Planning Inspectorate appeals service · full decision note · letter pins-corpus/6011103.txt