X · Search match excluded: services mentioned, tier not referenced
—
“support travel to larger settlements”
This was a PiP for up to three homes on a field beside a rural health hub at Waterloo Cross, about 2 km from Uffculme. The council could show only 2.4 years' supply. The site was not isolated, but it was outside any settlement. The inspector applied S5's "substantially outweighed" test without identifying which S5(1) category, if any, applied. Car dependence under TR3 and CC2 was given substantial weight and outweighed the limited housing benefit.
This decision was picked up by the search on the words above, which refer to services, not to a settlement tier. plain.
Decision on the Planning Inspectorate appeals service · full decision note · letter pins-corpus/6011431.txt