← Service Village Does Not Mean Sustainable

B · Tier acknowledged, location decided against on the route

Land south east of Oaklands, St Clere Hill Road, West Kingsdown

APP-G2245-C-26-3377906·Sevenoaks·8 Sept 2026allowed

Tier label used

service village

The tier sentence (from the case file)

“narrow lanes, service village, station 3+ miles”

The route sentence DL ¶18

“the site cannot be considered as sustainable in terms of public transport provision”

Summary

Enforcement appeal against a single-family Gypsy and Traveller pitch (one mobile home, one tourer) in the Metropolitan Green Belt and Kent Downs National Landscape, opposite ancient woodland. The inspector accepted the land as grey belt, noting that footnote 7 has been removed from the definition. On sustainable location, the inspector applied "some flexibility" under HO12 even though the site would have failed GB7(1)(g)(iii) as general housing. National Landscape harm and the policy balance pointed to refusal, but the children's best interests and the unmet pitch need justified a temporary 3-year personal permission, with ancient-woodland remediation and contamination conditions.

The location finding

  • GB7(1)(g)(iii): pass. "somewhat remote", narrow lanes, service village, station 3+ miles; would fail for general housing, but "some flexibility" applied via HO12 for traveller sites (DL 16-19)

Why this is cited

Service village noted; remoteness would fail general housing; allowed only via HO12 flexibility for traveller sites. In the register this counts as a case where the tier was acknowledged but the route evidence went against the site and decided the location.

Sources

Decision on the Planning Inspectorate casework portal · full decision note · quoted from cases/APP-G2245-C-26-3377906.md

One entry in a register of 203 decisions that matched the search for a settlement-tier label, each read at every matching passage and classified by how the label influenced the decision. The quotation was checked against the source named above. Not legal advice. © Planning Distilled. Text, data and images on this page are released under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 licence: share and adapt them freely, with credit to Planning Distilled. Quotations from decision letters, plans and the Framework remain the copyright of their publishers. Source and data: github.com/planningdistilled/research.