← Service Village Does Not Mean Sustainable

E · Descriptive only

30 Hadrians Walk, Alcester

stratford-26-01376-FUL·Stratford-on-Avon·17 Sept 2026refused·26/01376/FUL

Tier label used

Main Rural Centre

The tier sentence (from the case file)

“Site inside the BUAB of Alcester (Main Rural Centre)”

Summary

Two houses in a garden inside Alcester's settlement boundary, with the dwellings placed in Flood Zones 2 and 3. Refused under delegated powers on 17 September 2026. This is the clearest SDC example so far of the S4(2)(c) mechanism: failure of a national policy that says development "should be refused" (F7, with F5 and F6) makes the benefits "likely to be substantially outweighed", despite substantial weight to housing.

Why this is cited

Descriptive; refused on flood risk. In the register this counts as a descriptive mention that played no part in the reasoning.

Sources

Application on the council planning portal · full decision note · quoted from cases/stratford-26-01376-FUL.md

One entry in a register of 203 decisions that matched the search for a settlement-tier label, each read at every matching passage and classified by how the label influenced the decision. The quotation was checked against the source named above. Not legal advice. © Planning Distilled. Text, data and images on this page are released under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 licence: share and adapt them freely, with credit to Planning Distilled. Quotations from decision letters, plans and the Framework remain the copyright of their publishers. Source and data: github.com/planningdistilled/research.