50 Arthur Road, Islington

appeal 6008065·Islington·28 August 2026dismissed
Decision
dismissed, 28 August 2026
Decided by
Planning Inspector: N Unwin
Authority
Islington (London)
Appeal reference
6008065
Application reference
P2025/2793/FUL
Procedure
written representations
Development
First-floor rear and mansard extensions and change of use from small HMO (C4) to large HMO (sui generis), 3 extra rooms
Site context
inside settlement
Green Belt
No
Framework applied
August 2026 NPPF
Determinative policies
s38(6), Islington DMP H2
Development plan policies
Islington Local Plan Strategic and DM Policies 2023 H2, H10
Main issues
supply of family housing

Summary

A small HMO was to be enlarged and changed into a large sui generis HMO. Dismissed as a loss of family housing under local policy H2. The loss arises because a C4 HMO can revert to a C3 house under PD rights, but a large HMO cannot (DL ¶6-10). The 2026 Framework was noted, but only the development plan was applied.

What made the difference

The PD fallback runs one way. Keeping the property within C3/C4 preserves its potential as a family home. The appellant's intentions were irrelevant because "future owners may wish to" revert it (DL ¶9). The L2 substantial weight to more homes or floorspace was not argued or considered.

Policy findings

Policy codes are those of the National Planning Policy Framework (August 2026) unless a development plan is named.

PolicyFindingWeightNote
H2 (Islington DMP)conflictC4 can revert to C3 family house under PD, sui generis large HMO cannot, so it is a loss of self-contained family housing without equivalent replacement (DL 6-10)

Key facts

Related decisions

Sources

This note is one of the decisions behind the NPPF 2026 Navigator, which shows how each Framework test has been applied across all the decisions in the database. Also available as Markdown.