Unit 9a, Birkdale Avenue, Selly Oak, Birmingham

appeal 6009473·Birmingham·17 September 2026allowed
Decision
allowed, 17 September 2026
Decided by
Planning Inspector: C Billings
Authority
Birmingham (West Midlands)
Appeal reference
6009473
Application reference
2026/00006/PA
Procedure
written representations
Development
Class MA prior approval — industrial-estate unit to 15 apartments
Homes
15
Site context
inside settlement
Green Belt
No
Framework applied
August 2026 NPPF
Determinative policies
GPDO Class MA.2(2)(d), P3(1), P3(2)(a)
Main issues
space standards; noise

Summary

Class MA prior approval was granted for 15 flats in an industrial-estate unit beside a railway. The studios met NDSS as one-person units. The Inspector used new P3, which covers pollution "the product of preexisting conditions in its vicinity", to hold that railway noise must be considered under MA.2(2)(d) via W.10(b). With mitigation, that noise was acceptable (DL ¶¶16–19).

What made the difference

A noise assessment and rear-corridor layout accepted by Environmental Protection, secured by conditions. The P3 reading answers appellants who argue that non-commercial noise sources fall outside the Class MA noise test (DL ¶17).

Policy findings

Policy codes are those of the National Planning Policy Framework (August 2026) unless a development plan is named.

PolicyFindingWeightNote
P3(1)passvia GPDO W.10(b), P3's "product of preexisting conditions in its vicinity" brings railway noise into MA.2(2)(d) though not a "commercial premises" (DL 16-17)
P3(2)(a)passwith enhanced glazing, mechanical ventilation and rear corridor, no harmful noise; conditions on insulation and overheating (DL 15, 19, 21)
GPDO Art 3(9A) NDSSpassstudios >37 sq m with shower rooms as 1b1p; double bed shown does not make them 2-person (DL 9-12)

Key facts

Sources

This note is one of the decisions behind the NPPF 2026 Navigator, which shows how each Framework test has been applied across all the decisions in the database. Also available as Markdown.